Thursday 27 August 2009

Stormy times for Festivals


As yet another festival bites the dust, (Beachdown) it is clear that only the strongest public events will survive the credit crunch.

At first glance it would appear that brand activity at festivals has declined in the past festival year. However, I honestly believe that it is not purely the case that brands are withdrawing, but that they are actually being less frivolous about their choice of festival. It appears that the “build it, brand it and they will come” approach is a thing of the past and rightly so.

I’m an advocate of the collaboration of brands and music as long as it is an enhancement of the music experience as opposed to a distraction or interruption. The last season of festivals really started to show signs of brands trying to totally interrupt the experience. One such example was the inclusion of a skate half pipe provided by an energy drink during a wet Wireless festival in 2008, it was of no value to any of the punters and it was in fact closed for the majority of the event.

This years Wireless Festival was as good as brandless from an experience point of view and it was really noticeable. What was the reason? One brand left and the others followed? Brands had less spend? To be honest, I am not sure but the thought that it was recession based was alleviated when I visited Lovebox the following month.

This year’s Lovebox was saturated with brand activity and if I am really honest, it was not a negative. The fact that there were so many brands there actually worked: the experiences really enhanced the event and the punters sure as hell got into all of the brand spaces I visited.

Clever brands are embracing experiences that are relevant and more often than not involve a great music experience in their own right. It’s not rocket science and it certainly isn’t groundbreaking to make a music event within a music event: Bacardi and Strongbow have been doing it for years with great success and now brands such as Rizla are following suit and building a hell of a following in the process.

Innovation is not necessarily the key to a successful activity, the key is relevance and enhancement. There have been some wonderfully simple executions that will be embraced and advocated by festival visitors - campaigns such as the 10p on a cup by Carling, or the Rizla invisible players for Rizla by Exposure. These memorable branded experiences do a great job with engagement and are very simple to execute, but I am sure they will be around as long as the very successful Strongbow Rooms and The Bacardi B-Bar.

If your product, service and your target demographic are relevant to a certain festival then why would you not consider festivals as part of your strategy. They deliver captive audiences that will engage with you and your product   - as long as it fits and it enhances their experience.

The other important factor to consider (seriously consider) is the content that will you get from the involvement in a festival. What sort of amplification will you be afforded and how will you engage with the people you met at that event long after the event has finished?

In these times, ROI is king and if you as a marketer think that being there is enough to drive sales, then you are wrong. There is life beyond live and you must engage and amplify or the tens and hundreds of thousands of pounds that you spend will be worth nothing to the bottom line.

Give your fans something to talk about. Innocent’s village fete showed us that just because it was innocent’s festival, it didn’t mean that the audience forgot about the great experiences that were supplied by the likes of Yorkshire Tea and Pimms. Word of mouth is still one of the most powerful tools in terms of behaviour and opinion changing by consumers.

But if it don’t fit, then don’t try to shoehorn it in, because the consumer will hate you for it.

The targeting comes down to meeting your objectives and the relevance of your offering to the event and its audience. Some brands are lucky that they can strategically fit into many types of festival with little danger of disconnection or lack of relevance. Take for example the Pimms Bus: this experience can happily drop into most form of festivals from arts, historical racing, flying displays and village fetes to multi act music festivals.

Choosing the right festival is an imperative and should be right at the heart of the strategy or you will easily become another ‘me too’ festival player and just be considered ‘Live Spam’.

There is another serious consideration that brands should look at: is their experience and content worthy of a fee?

If your experience is strong enough there is every chance that you will get away with charging consumers for the privilege of being there and then you can further amplify the experience by giving them some price worthy content to take away.

As ever this years V Festival was a stonker and the eminent brand experiences of Strongbow and Bacardi drew in the masses as ever so it proves that there is still huge value to brands that feel festival activity will hit their target audience.